Assessed Intelligence | Your Secure and Responsible Technology Partner
Assessment PackageVALIDATEINNOVATE

Risk, Exposure and Discovery

The RED Assessment.
Know What You Have.
Before It Becomes a Liability.

A strategic alignment process grounded in the ARISE Framework. The technical and legal prerequisite for deploying high-risk technology, delivering executives a prioritised view of their top risks, exposures, and hidden assets.

R
Risk
E
Exposure
D
Discovery
98%
Of organisations run unverified or shadow AI applications without governance oversight

What Is the RED Assessment

From Reactive Uncertainty to a Disciplined, Proactive Posture.

Many clients begin with the RED Assessment because it rapidly surfaces the top business risks, priority GRC requirements, and immediate value opportunities essential for safe and responsible AI deployment. It gives leaders focused, actionable evidence rather than an exhaustive review.

The RED Assessment evaluates three critical dimensions simultaneously: the Risk of technology failure or misuse, the Exposure of systems to external and internal pressures, and the Discovery of technology operating outside formal governance. Together, they surface the priority risks, exposures, and hidden assets that demand immediate leadership attention.

The result is a prioritised action register and executive briefing, not a comprehensive audit. It surfaces what matters most, scoped to produce immediate, actionable direction.

ARISE Framework Grounded

The RED Assessment is built on the ARISE Framework, Assessed Intelligence’s 7-domain assurance model covering GOVERN, MANAGE, IDENTIFY, PROTECT, DETECT, RESPOND, and VALIDATE. Priority findings are mapped to a structured, standards-aligned baseline.

Services Used in This Package

The RED Assessment draws on two Assessed Intelligence service lines working in combination:

VALIDATE | AuditINNOVATE | Solutions

Ideal Starting Point

Designed as the entry point for organisations deploying or operating high-risk technology. The RED Assessment surfaces priority risks and gaps quickly, providing the baseline needed before deeper advisory, audit, or retainer engagements begin. Scoped to produce direction, not exhaustive coverage.

Three Critical Dimensions

Risk. Exposure. Discovery.

Each dimension addresses a distinct layer of organisational vulnerability. Together, they surface the highest-priority risks, the most significant exposure points, and the shadow technology most likely to create governance and regulatory liability.

R
Risk
Identifying Business and Operational Vulnerabilities
Strategic
Strategic Alignment
Evaluating whether AI and technical deployments support or contradict the core mission and risk appetite of the board. Technology that conflicts with strategic direction creates compounding liability.
Impact Analysis
Assessing the consequences of system failure, including legal liability, ethical breaches, and operational downtime. Quantifying the business cost of failure before it occurs.
Threat Landscape
Identifying the specific actors and environmental factors that pose a threat to the integrity and availability of organisational assets. Specific threats to your context, not generic lists.
E
Exposure
Mapping the Surface of Vulnerability
Technical
Data Provenance and Flow
Mapping how data moves through the organisation to identify where sensitive information may be exposed to unauthorised access or poisoning. Understanding data lineage is the foundation of governance.
Adversarial Surface
Identifying the technical interfaces where AI models and critical infrastructure can be manipulated, including public APIs, third-party integrations, and model inference endpoints accessible to external actors.
Dependency Mapping
Uncovering the hidden risks within the supply chain, including third-party models, libraries, and cloud service providers that create systemic exposure. What your vendors do affects what you can defend.
D
Discovery
Surfacing Hidden Technical Realities
Governance
Asset Identification
Locating Shadow AI and undocumented technical debt that exists outside of formal governance. You cannot manage, audit, or defend what you have not inventoried. Most organisations are surprised by what this surfaces.
Requirement Cataloguing
Identifying the specific regulatory, legal, and contractual obligations, including the EU AI Act, NIST standards, and sector-specific requirements, that apply to the identified systems.
Value Opportunity
Recognising where technology can be safely optimised to drive innovation without compromising the organisation’s secure and responsible posture. Governance is an enabler of sustainable advantage.

Strategic Value

Informed Leadership. Evidence-Based Decisions. Defensible Outcomes.

A RED Assessment moves an organisation from instinct to evidence. Resources are allocated based on what the data shows, not what leaders assume. GRC becomes a measurable operational capability, not a periodic compliance exercise.

The result is a defensible roadmap that prioritises actions based on the actual severity of risk and the reality of exposure. Technical leaders and boards can navigate the complexity of high-risk technology with integrity, discipline, and accountability.

What Organisations Achieve

A prioritised register of the highest-risk AI and technology systems, including those identified as operating outside formal governance

A prioritised risk register mapped to actual threat actors, exposure points, and operational impact scenarios

A regulatory and contractual obligation map identifying which standards and laws apply to which systems

A board-ready executive summary translating technical findings into business consequence and investment priority

A defensible roadmap with sequenced remediation actions ordered by risk severity and resource constraint

A documented baseline that satisfies pre-audit requirements for ISO, NIST, and ForHumanity certification readiness

What You Receive

Prioritised Outputs. Designed for Immediate Action.

The RED Assessment produces a focused set of prioritised outputs, not a comprehensive audit. Each deliverable is scoped for immediate use by leadership and technical teams.

01

Executive Briefing

A concise, board-ready summary of top findings and prioritised risk exposure. Clear view of where the organisation must act first, without requiring technical expertise to interpret.

02

Prioritised Risk Register

Top identified risks and exposure points classified by severity and regulatory relevance. Focused on the highest-impact items, structured for immediate use by security and engineering teams.

03

Regulatory Obligation Map

Mapping of identified systems against applicable obligations: EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, GDPR, and sector-specific requirements. Confirms which standards apply and where gaps exist.

04

Defensible Roadmap

A sequenced action plan prioritising remediation activities by risk severity and resource reality. Built to be executed, not aspirational.

05

ARISE Baseline Score

Maturity baseline across all seven ARISE Framework domains: GOVERN, MANAGE, IDENTIFY, PROTECT, DETECT, RESPOND, VALIDATE. Benchmark for future improvement measurement.

06

Value Opportunity Catalogue

Identification of where technology can be safely optimised or expanded without increasing risk exposure. Transforms governance from a cost centre into a source of operational advantage.

How It Works

Four Phases. Structured Delivery.

The RED Assessment follows a focused four-phase engagement model. Every phase is scoped to surface priority risks quickly, not to produce exhaustive documentation.

Engagement: Small to Medium Org
3–4 Weeks
A structured 3 to 4 week engagement delivering a prioritised risk action register and executive briefing.
01

Scope and Brief

Stakeholder interviews, system context gathering, and objective alignment. Confirms the assessment boundary and priority domains.

02

Assess and Discover

Targeted engineering-level review, data flow mapping, shadow AI identification, and threat landscape analysis. Scoped to surface priority risks.

03

Analyse and Map

Risk classification, regulatory obligation mapping, ARISE Framework scoring, and value opportunity identification. Evidence into structured findings.

04

Report and Handover

Delivery of prioritised outputs including executive briefing, top-risk register, action roadmap, and ARISE baseline score. Leadership briefing session included.

Assessed Intelligence

Security Remains a Prerequisite to Responsibility.

The RED Assessment is not an audit. It is a prioritised discovery that tells leadership where to act first. It is what responsible technology leadership looks like before a deployment decision, not after an incident.

Get Assessed — Start Today

Start With What You Know.
Then Govern What You Have.

The RED Assessment is the right first step for any organisation deploying or operating high-risk technology. Connect with our team to scope your engagement and understand what a prioritised RED Assessment looks like for your organisation.

Forged by Experience  ·  Driven by Purpose  ·  Built to Endure